Beware China's ties to the Taliban
By Jesse Helms
The deadly attacks on the United States in New York and Washington
prompted some suggestions that the U.S. must work with Communist China to
combat international terrorism. This is a badly misguided proposal that
merits a hasty burial. Given the resolve the Bush administration has
displayed toward China to date, it is unlikely to fall into this trap.
The very notion that the United States needs Chinese assistance is
based on the flawed assumption that as a member of the U.N. Security
Council, China's acquiescence somehow becomes essential to the adoption of a
resolution approving the use of force against whomever the U.S. deems
responsible for the attacks in New York and Washington. To the contrary,
nothing could be more disastrous.
We have been down this U.N. road to disaster before. During Operation
Desert Shield, the United States sought the approval of the Security Council
to use force against Saddam Hussein, but the resolution that was, in fact,
adopted, approved the use of force only to expel Iraqi forces from Kuwait,
nothing more.
The very nature of that resolution tied the hands of U.S. forces and
was one of the justifications used for stopping Operation Desert Storm with
the Iraqi Republican Guard intact and Saddam still in power.
That was a mistake that has been regretted to this day, and now that
the forces of international terrorism have struck New York and Washington,
the U.S. cannot afford to waste time and energy consulting the United
Nations.
The second rationale for working with the Chinese is the weird
assumption that China and the United States share a common interest in
fighting terrorism.
What a naive and dangerous fantasy.
The fact is, the Communist Chinese government is in bed with every one
of the terrorist and terrorist-supporting rogue regimes (is it not now time
that we dispose of the laughable "countries of concern" nonsense?) of the
Middle East.
China's alliance with major rogue regimes has been so extensive and so
well known for so long that it is absurd to pretend otherwise. Indeed, it is
equally absurd to expect assistance against terrorism from a regime that has
supplied nuclear and missile technology to Pakistan and Iran, chemical
weapons materials to Iran, missile technology to Libya and air defense
equipment to help Iraq shoot down U.S. pilots, all of which China has done.
Less well known is that the Chinese government is one of the foremost
benefactors of Afghanistan's ruling Taliban, the focus of so much of U.S.
attention since Sept. 11. Moreover, China is the largest foreign investor in
Afghanistan.
On Sept. 11, Pakistan's Frontier Post reported that the Chinese and
Afghani governments had signed a new economic and technical cooperation
agreement. A defense cooperation agreement was signed in 1998 after Taliban
officials allowed Chinese scientists to inspect unexploded cruise missiles
that had been fired on Afghanistan in retaliation for Osama bin Laden's
attacks on U.S. embassies in Africa.
Those who imagine that the U.S. shares common interests with the
Chinese in combating Islamic-based terrorism most likely base their
assumption on China's fight against supposed Uighur terrorism in Xinjiang
Province, formerly known as East Turkestan.
But there is an ugly catch to that: If the U.S. should end up receiving
any kind of support from Beijing for our anti-terrorist efforts, it will
almost certainly come at the price of acquiescing in China's crackdown on
the Uighurs (as well as its attempts to crush Tibet and isolate Taiwan).
That would be a moral calamity, for there is no justification in
lumping the Uighurs with the murderous fanatics who demonstrably mean us
harm. The Uighurs are engaged in a just struggle for freedom from Beijing's
tyrannical rule, for the most part peacefully. For this, they have been
viciously suppressed, with the Chinese government arresting and torturing
political prisoners, destroying mosques and opening fire on peaceful
demonstrations.
The goals of the United States are clear. Having been attacked, America
properly seeks to punish and deter fanatical, mostly small, Islamic groups
and their state sponsors. China, on the other hand, has two goals, both
utterly incompatible with ours.
Internally, the Chinese government is at war with all of Islam. As a
religion, and as a means of organizing and inspiring people, Islam
represents a mortal threat to Chinese communist rule. Externally, China's
ultimate goal is to destroy America's status as the sole superpower in the
world.
To the Chinese government, this is a zero-sum game: anything that
embarrasses, diminishes or bloodies the United States automatically serves
China's interest. (Witness the nationalistic glee, assiduously stoked by the
Chinese government, that was on display on the Internet in China in the wake
of the attacks.)
In its anti-U.S. effort, the Chinese government finds the Islamic rogue
regimes of the Middle East to be useful allies.
Strategically and morally, the United States cannot and must not assume
that China is part of a solution to terrorism. Indeed, Communist China is a
very large part of the problem.
Jesse Helms of North Carolina is the senior Republican on the Senate Foreign
Relations Committee.
USE BROWSER [ BACK BUTTON ] TO RETURN TO HOME PAGE....